lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <362dce57-c28b-3258-7411-1c0724545c3f@canonical.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 Jul 2017 14:13:35 +0100
From:   Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] spi: loopback-test: make several module parameters
 static

On 18/07/17 14:09, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 01:42:32PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> 
> It would be very helpful if you could ensure your commit author and
> e-mail From: line up so that git doesn't make your patches look like
> non-author signoffs.
> 
> The [next] isn't needed in the subject line either, it just makes more
> of the subject line get hidden.
> 
ACK, will do. Want me to resend this patch?



Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (838 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ