linux-kernel - [PATCH 5/7] signal/testing: Don't look for __SI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:06:49 -0500
From:   "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
        Andrei Vagin <avagin@...tuozzo.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
        Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>,
        Serge Hallyn <serge@...lyn.com>,
        Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...tuozzo.com>,
        Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/7] signal/testing: Don't look for __SI_FAULT in userspace

Fix the debug print statements in these tests where they reference
si_codes and in particular __SI_FAULT.  __SI_FAULT is a kernel
internal value and should never be seen by userspace.

While I am in there also fix si_code_str.  si_codes are an enumeration
there are not a bitmap so == and not & is the apropriate operation to
test for an si_code.

Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Fixes: 5f23f6d082a9 ("x86/pkeys: Add self-tests")
Fixes: e754aedc26ef ("x86/mpx, selftests: Add MPX self test")
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/mpx-mini-test.c   |  3 +--
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c | 13 ++++++-------
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/mpx-mini-test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/mpx-mini-test.c
index a8df159a8924..ec0f6b45ce8b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/mpx-mini-test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/mpx-mini-test.c
@@ -391,8 +391,7 @@ void handler(int signum, siginfo_t *si, void *vucontext)
 		br_count++;
 		dprintf1("#BR 0x%jx (total seen: %d)\n", status, br_count);
 
-#define __SI_FAULT      (3 << 16)
-#define SEGV_BNDERR     (__SI_FAULT|3)  /* failed address bound checks */
+#define SEGV_BNDERR     3  /* failed address bound checks */
 
 		dprintf2("Saw a #BR! status 0x%jx at %016lx br_reason: %jx\n",
 				status, ip, br_reason);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
index 3237bc010e1c..23927845518d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c
@@ -212,19 +212,18 @@ void dump_mem(void *dumpme, int len_bytes)
 	}
 }
 
-#define __SI_FAULT      (3 << 16)
-#define SEGV_BNDERR     (__SI_FAULT|3)  /* failed address bound checks */
-#define SEGV_PKUERR     (__SI_FAULT|4)
+#define SEGV_BNDERR     3  /* failed address bound checks */
+#define SEGV_PKUERR     4
 
 static char *si_code_str(int si_code)
 {
-	if (si_code & SEGV_MAPERR)
+	if (si_code == SEGV_MAPERR)
 		return "SEGV_MAPERR";
-	if (si_code & SEGV_ACCERR)
+	if (si_code == SEGV_ACCERR)
 		return "SEGV_ACCERR";
-	if (si_code & SEGV_BNDERR)
+	if (si_code == SEGV_BNDERR)
 		return "SEGV_BNDERR";
-	if (si_code & SEGV_PKUERR)
+	if (si_code == SEGV_PKUERR)
 		return "SEGV_PKUERR";
 	return "UNKNOWN";
 }
-- 
2.10.1