lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 18:32:45 +0300 From: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com> To: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>, Dmitri Prokhorov <Dmitry.Prohorov@...el.com>, Valery Cherepennikov <valery.cherepennikov@...el.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@...gle.com>, Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4]: perf/core: complete replace of lists by rb trees for pinned and flexible groups at perf_event_context On 18.07.2017 18:23, Alexander Shishkin wrote: > Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com> writes: > >>> You probably also want to explain this change, for example change the >>> @group_list description, saying that something else links into it now. >>> >> >> The whole patch as a single commit, attached to patch v5 4/4, may provide >> the complete view of suggested changes. > > No, each patch has to be readable on its own. If one has to jump between > patches to figure out what's going on, it's already discouraging. The > point of submitting a patch, on the other hand, is to encourage the > reviewers to read on. Agree. That was my initial intention when splitting into several patches. > > Regards, > -- > Alex >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists