[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1500394761.4585.11.camel@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 17:19:21 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzin@...hat.com>,
Christoffer Dall <cdall@...aro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.16 121/178] kvm: arm/arm64: Fix locking for
kvm_free_stage2_pgd
On Mon, 2017-07-17 at 16:12 +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 16/07/17 14:56, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > 3.16.46-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> > ------------------
> >
> > From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
> >
[...]
> There is a follow up patch for this one to make sure we check/free the PGD under the
> mmu_lock.
>
> commit 6c0d706b563af73 ("kvm: arm/arm64: Fix race in resetting stage2 PGD")
>
> So unless you want to fold that in, this looks alright. Looks like we missed a Cc:
> stable for that. I will send it to stable soon.
That does look like a fix suitable for stable. So far as I can see,
though, "kvm: arm/arm64: Fix locking for kvm_free_stage2_pgd" does not
introduce a regression - right? So I don't have to apply the two at
the same time.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Quantity is no substitute for quality, but it's the only one we've got.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists