[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170718164350.GB22334@nazgul.tnic>
Date:   Tue, 18 Jul 2017 18:43:50 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     "Kani, Toshimitsu" <toshi.kani@....com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        "rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        "srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com" 
        <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        "lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
        "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ACPI / blacklist: add acpi_match_oemlist() interface
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 03:48:54PM +0000, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> This patch defines 'struct acpi_oemlist' in "include/linux/acpi.h" as a
I see that.
> common structure, and replaces this specific 'struct acpi_blacklist'.
And what makes acpi_oemlist "common" and acpi_blacklist "specific"?
So let me save you some time - "oemlist" is more specific than
"blacklist" and I can imagine a blacklist item not always being
oem-specific.
What I'm hinting at is, don't change that name. acpi_blacklist is just
fine.
> Agreed.  Will change to a shorter name like below. 
> 
> 	enum acpi_oemlist_pred predicate;
	enum acpi_predicate pred;
is even better.
-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
