[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170718002120.yvuhjue7u7evljb4@kerndev>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 20:21:20 -0400
From: Jacob von Chorus <jacobvonchorus@...hoto.ca>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Insop Song <insop.song@...nspeed.com>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: gs_fpgaboot: add buffer overflow checks
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 10:53:25PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > + if (len + 1 > n) {
>
> It's more idiomatic to say "if (len >= n)". Plus that's a good habbit
My reasoning behind using "((len + 1) > n)" is that len represents the length of
the string without null-termination. "buf" is required to store a
null-terminator on top of len. Using "len + 1" shows this requirement
more clearly; I will add brackets around "len + 1" for emphasis.
Thanks for the feedback, I will send a v2.
Regards,
Jacob von Chorus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists