[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fcf0b39c-2683-e88d-b619-8ff66707b099@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 11:54:20 -0500
From: Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
To: Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>, <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
<ssantosh@...nel.org>
CC: <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <nsekhar@...com>, <fcooper@...com>,
<linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] gpio: davinci: Handle the return value of
davinci_gpio_irq_setup function
Hi Keerthy,
On 07/18/2017 05:57 AM, Keerthy wrote:
> Currently davinci_gpio_irq_setup return value is ignored. Handle the
> return value appropriately.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
> index 2c88054..932f270 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
> @@ -233,15 +233,23 @@ static int davinci_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> chips->regs[bank] = gpio_base + offset_array[bank];
>
> ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(dev, &chips->chip, chips);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err;
> +
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, chips);
> + ret = davinci_gpio_irq_setup(pdev);
> if (ret) {
> - ctrl_num = 0;
> - bank_base = 0;
> - return ret;
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
This is not needed, driver core will set this automatically if probe fails.
> + goto err;
> }
>
> - platform_set_drvdata(pdev, chips);
> - davinci_gpio_irq_setup(pdev);
> return 0;
> +
> +err:
> + ctrl_num = 0;
> + bank_base = 0;
Same comments as on Patch 1.
regards
Suman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists