lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1500397144-16232-9-git-send-email-jintack.lim@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 18 Jul 2017 11:58:34 -0500
From:   Jintack Lim <jintack.lim@...aro.org>
To:     kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, christoffer.dall@...aro.org,
        marc.zyngier@....com
Cc:     corbet@....net, pbonzini@...hat.com, rkrcmar@...hat.com,
        linux@...linux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@....com,
        will.deacon@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mchehab@...nel.org,
        cov@...eaurora.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
        david.daney@...ium.com, mark.rutland@....com,
        suzuki.poulose@....com, stefan@...lo-penguin.com,
        andy.gross@...aro.org, wcohen@...hat.com,
        ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org, shankerd@...eaurora.org,
        vladimir.murzin@....com, james.morse@....com,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Jintack Lim <jintack.lim@...aro.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 08/38] KVM: arm64: Add EL2 special registers to vcpu context

To support the virtual EL2 execution, we need to maintain the EL2
special registers such as SPSR_EL2, ELR_EL2 and SP_EL2 in vcpu context.

Note that SP_EL2 is not accessible in EL2, so we don't need a trap
handler for this register.

Signed-off-by: Jintack Lim <jintack.lim@...aro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 12 ++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h   |  4 ++++
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c         | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h         |  8 ++++++++
 4 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 1dc4ed6..57dccde 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -171,6 +171,15 @@ enum vcpu_sysreg {
 	NR_SYS_REGS	/* Nothing after this line! */
 };
 
+enum el2_special_regs {
+	__INVALID_EL2_SPECIAL_REG__,
+	SPSR_EL2,	/* Saved Program Status Register (EL2) */
+	ELR_EL2,	/* Exception Link Register (EL2) */
+	SP_EL2,		/* Stack Pointer (EL2) */
+
+	NR_EL2_SPECIAL_REGS
+};
+
 /* 32bit mapping */
 #define c0_MPIDR	(MPIDR_EL1 * 2)	/* MultiProcessor ID Register */
 #define c0_CSSELR	(CSSELR_EL1 * 2)/* Cache Size Selection Register */
@@ -218,6 +227,8 @@ struct kvm_cpu_context {
 		u64 sys_regs[NR_SYS_REGS];
 		u32 copro[NR_COPRO_REGS];
 	};
+
+	u64 el2_special_regs[NR_EL2_SPECIAL_REGS];
 };
 
 typedef struct kvm_cpu_context kvm_cpu_context_t;
@@ -307,6 +318,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
 
 #define vcpu_gp_regs(v)		(&(v)->arch.ctxt.gp_regs)
 #define vcpu_sys_reg(v,r)	((v)->arch.ctxt.sys_regs[(r)])
+#define vcpu_el2_sreg(v,r)	((v)->arch.ctxt.el2_special_regs[(r)])
 /*
  * CP14 and CP15 live in the same array, as they are backed by the
  * same system registers.
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
index 9277c4a..98c32ef 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
@@ -268,6 +268,8 @@
 
 #define SYS_DACR32_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 3, 0, 0)
 
+#define SYS_SPSR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 4, 0, 0)
+#define SYS_ELR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 4, 0, 1)
 #define SYS_SP_EL1			sys_reg(3, 4, 4, 1, 0)
 
 #define SYS_IFSR32_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 5, 0, 1)
@@ -332,6 +334,8 @@
 #define SYS_CNTVOFF_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 14, 0, 3)
 #define SYS_CNTHCTL_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 14, 1, 0)
 
+#define SYS_SP_EL2			sys_reg(3, 6, 4, 1, 0)
+
 /* Common SCTLR_ELx flags. */
 #define SCTLR_ELx_EE    (1 << 25)
 #define SCTLR_ELx_I	(1 << 12)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 1568f8b..2b3ed70 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -900,15 +900,33 @@ static inline void access_rw(struct sys_reg_params *p, u64 *sysreg)
 		*sysreg = p->regval;
 }
 
+static u64 *get_special_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p)
+{
+	u64 reg = sys_reg(p->Op0, p->Op1, p->CRn, p->CRm, p->Op2);
+
+	switch (reg) {
+	case SYS_SP_EL1:
+		return &vcpu->arch.ctxt.gp_regs.sp_el1;
+	case SYS_ELR_EL2:
+		return &vcpu_el2_sreg(vcpu, ELR_EL2);
+	case SYS_SPSR_EL2:
+		return &vcpu_el2_sreg(vcpu, SPSR_EL2);
+	default:
+		return NULL;
+	};
+}
+
 static bool trap_el2_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			 struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			 const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
 {
-	/* SP_EL1 is NOT maintained in sys_regs array */
-	if (sys_reg(p->Op0, p->Op1, p->CRn, p->CRm, p->Op2) == SYS_SP_EL1)
-		access_rw(p, &vcpu->arch.ctxt.gp_regs.sp_el1);
-	else
-		access_rw(p, &vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg));
+	u64 *sys_reg;
+
+	sys_reg = get_special_reg(vcpu, p);
+	if (!sys_reg)
+		sys_reg = &vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg);
+
+	access_rw(p, sys_reg);
 
 	return true;
 }
@@ -1116,6 +1134,8 @@ static bool trap_el2_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_DACR32_EL2), NULL, reset_unknown, DACR32_EL2 },
 
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_SPSR_EL2), trap_el2_regs, reset_special, SPSR_EL2, 0 },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ELR_EL2), trap_el2_regs, reset_special, ELR_EL2, 0 },
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_SP_EL1), trap_el2_regs },
 
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_IFSR32_EL2), NULL, reset_unknown, IFSR32_EL2 },
@@ -1138,6 +1158,8 @@ static bool trap_el2_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_CNTVOFF_EL2), trap_el2_regs, reset_val, CNTVOFF_EL2, 0 },
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_CNTHCTL_EL2), trap_el2_regs, reset_val, CNTHCTL_EL2, 0 },
+
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_SP_EL2), NULL, reset_special, SP_EL2, 0},
 };
 
 static bool trap_dbgidr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
@@ -2271,6 +2293,8 @@ void kvm_reset_sys_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 	/* Catch someone adding a register without putting in reset entry. */
 	memset(&vcpu->arch.ctxt.sys_regs, 0x42, sizeof(vcpu->arch.ctxt.sys_regs));
+	memset(&vcpu->arch.ctxt.el2_special_regs, 0x42,
+	       sizeof(vcpu->arch.ctxt.el2_special_regs));
 
 	/* Generic chip reset first (so target could override). */
 	reset_sys_reg_descs(vcpu, sys_reg_descs, ARRAY_SIZE(sys_reg_descs));
@@ -2281,4 +2305,8 @@ void kvm_reset_sys_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	for (num = 1; num < NR_SYS_REGS; num++)
 		if (vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, num) == 0x4242424242424242)
 			panic("Didn't reset vcpu_sys_reg(%zi)", num);
+
+	for (num = 1; num < NR_EL2_SPECIAL_REGS; num++)
+		if (vcpu_el2_sreg(vcpu, num) == 0x4242424242424242)
+			panic("Didn't reset vcpu_el2_sreg(%zi)", num);
 }
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h
index 060f534..827717b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h
@@ -99,6 +99,14 @@ static inline void reset_val(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r
 	vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) = r->val;
 }
 
+static inline void reset_special(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+				 const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
+{
+	BUG_ON(!r->reg);
+	BUG_ON(r->reg >= NR_EL2_SPECIAL_REGS);
+	vcpu_el2_sreg(vcpu, r->reg) = r->val;
+}
+
 static inline int cmp_sys_reg(const struct sys_reg_desc *i1,
 			      const struct sys_reg_desc *i2)
 {
-- 
1.9.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ