[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f8f33c82-6f08-bd8c-ecbb-df1f1c719624@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 23:16:07 +0530
From: Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
To: Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>, <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
<ssantosh@...nel.org>
CC: <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <nsekhar@...com>, <fcooper@...com>,
<linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] gpio: davinci: Handle the return value of
davinci_gpio_irq_setup function
On Tuesday 18 July 2017 10:24 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
> Hi Keerthy,
>
> On 07/18/2017 05:57 AM, Keerthy wrote:
>> Currently davinci_gpio_irq_setup return value is ignored. Handle the
>> return value appropriately.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
>> index 2c88054..932f270 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
>> @@ -233,15 +233,23 @@ static int davinci_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> chips->regs[bank] = gpio_base + offset_array[bank];
>>
>> ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(dev, &chips->chip, chips);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto err;
>> +
>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, chips);
>> + ret = davinci_gpio_irq_setup(pdev);
>> if (ret) {
>> - ctrl_num = 0;
>> - bank_base = 0;
>> - return ret;
>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
>
> This is not needed, driver core will set this automatically if probe fails.
okay. I will remove this.
>
>> + goto err;
>> }
>>
>> - platform_set_drvdata(pdev, chips);
>> - davinci_gpio_irq_setup(pdev);
>> return 0;
>> +
>> +err:
>> + ctrl_num = 0;
>> + bank_base = 0;
>
> Same comments as on Patch 1.
Yup will fix this as i have done with Patch 1.
>
> regards
> Suman
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists