lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170719151721.GA31932@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 19 Jul 2017 17:17:21 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Cc:     Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
        xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xen: xen-pciback: remove DRIVER_ATTR() usage

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 04:51:02PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 19/07/17 16:43, Greg KH wrote:
> > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> > 
> > It's better to be explicit and use the DRIVER_ATTR_RW() and
> > DRIVER_ATTR_RO() macros when defining a driver's sysfs file.
> > 
> > Bonus is this fixes up a checkpatch.pl warning.
> > 
> > This is part of a series to drop DRIVER_ATTR() from the tree entirely.
> > 
> > Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
> > Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
> 
> I'll take this through the Xen tree, unless you want to use your tree.

If I can take it through mine, then I could drop DRIVER_ATTR() from the
whole tree for the next kernel release, which would be ideal.

But if you want to take it, that's fine, I can wait another release, no
rush.

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ