linux-kernel - Applied "spi: stm32: explicitly request exclusive reset control" to the spi tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 19 Jul 2017 17:08:55 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Applied "spi: stm32: explicitly request exclusive reset control" to the spi tree

The patch

   spi: stm32: explicitly request exclusive reset control

has been applied to the spi tree at

   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git 

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

>From d5e9a4a433f7d082538268501fa684ada2c76552 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 17:26:20 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] spi: stm32: explicitly request exclusive reset control

Commit a53e35db70d1 ("reset: Ensure drivers are explicit when requesting
reset lines") started to transition the reset control request API calls
to explicitly state whether the driver needs exclusive or shared reset
control behavior. Convert all drivers requesting exclusive resets to the
explicit API call so the temporary transition helpers can be removed.

No functional changes.

Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>
Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
Cc: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-stm32.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-stm32.c b/drivers/spi/spi-stm32.c
index 75644bcd938b..680cdf549506 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-stm32.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-stm32.c
@@ -1132,7 +1132,7 @@ static int stm32_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		goto err_master_put;
 	}

-	spi->rst = devm_reset_control_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
+	spi->rst = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(&pdev->dev, NULL);
 	if (!IS_ERR(spi->rst)) {
 		reset_control_assert(spi->rst);
 		udelay(2);
-- 
2.13.2