linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: qcom_hidma: correct overriding message

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170719040917.GD3053@localhost>
Date:   Wed, 19 Jul 2017 09:39:18 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To:     Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, timur@...eaurora.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
        David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        linux-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: qcom_hidma: correct overriding message

On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 10:30:37AM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> A false overriding information is being presented during boot
> under this scenario.
> 
> 1. First object checks for kernel command line value against zero.
> 2. It doesn't find it, it sets the command line variable to the
> value coming from ACPI/DT.
> 3. Second object is being probed.
> 4. Second object sees that the value of kernel command line
> override is non-zero, it prints an overriding message even though
> value matches ACPI/DT value.
> 
> hidma-mgmt QCOM8060:03: overriding max-write-burst-bytes: 1024
> 
> Add an additional check to verify that kernel command line value
> is different from the ACPI/DT value.

Applied both, thanks

-- 
~Vinod