[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eba13ecf-1034-dbfa-0398-4a907cf13b29@mleia.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 00:02:46 +0300
From: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>
To: gabriel.fernandez@...com
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
daniel.thompson@...aro.org, andrea.merello@...il.com,
radoslaw.pietrzyk@...il.com, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux.tyco@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
ludovic.barre@...com, olivier.bideau@...com,
amelie.delaunay@...com, gabriel.fernandez.st@...il.com,
Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] clk: gate: expose clk_gate_ops::is_enabled
On 07/19/2017 05:25 PM, gabriel.fernandez@...com wrote:
> From: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@...com>
>
> This patch exposes clk_gate_ops::is_enabled as functions
> that can be directly called and assigned in places like this so
> we don't need wrapper functions that do nothing besides forward
> the call.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@...com>
> Sugested by Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Fixing the spelling etc. I believe the last tag line should be
Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
--
With best wishes,
Vladimir
Powered by blists - more mailing lists