lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 19 Jul 2017 15:57:11 +1000
From:   Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To:     Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ntb@...glegroups.com, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Horia Geantă <horia.geanta@....com>,
        Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>,
        Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        Suresh Warrier <warrier@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] powerpc: io.h: move iomap.h include so that it can use readq/writeq defs

Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com> writes:

> Subsequent patches in this series makes use of the readq and writeq
> defines in iomap.h. However, as is, they get missed on the powerpc
> platform seeing the include comes before the define. This patch
> moves the include down to fix this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
> Cc: Suresh Warrier <warrier@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: "Oliver O'Halloran" <oohall@...il.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Seems fair enough, have you tested it at all?

cheers

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ