[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170719142120.d00469cf9fce844d40b9988e@magewell.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 14:21:20 +0800
From: Yong <yong.deng@...ewell.com>
To: Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>
Cc: mchehab@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com, wens@...e.org,
hans.verkuil@...co.com, peter.griffin@...aro.org,
hugues.fruchet@...com, krzk@...nel.org, bparrot@...com,
arnd@...db.de, jean-christophe.trotin@...com,
benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org, tiffany.lin@...iatek.com,
kamil@...as.org, kieran+renesas@...uared.org.uk,
andrew-ct.chen@...iatek.com, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] dt-bindings: add binding documentation for
Allwinner CSI
Hi Baruch,
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 07:49:23 +0300
Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il> wrote:
> Hi Yong,
>
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 09:22:49AM +0800, Yong wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 14:55:30 +0300
> > Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il> wrote:
> > > I am trying to get this driver working on the Olimex A33 OLinuXino. I
> > > didn't get it working yet, but I had some progress. See the comment below
> > > on one issue I encountered.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 07:07:34PM +0800, Yong Deng wrote:
> > > > Add binding documentation for Allwinner CSI.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Yong Deng <yong.deng@...ewell.com>
> > > > ---
>
> [...]
>
> > > > +Example:
> > > > +
> > > > + csi1: csi@...b4000 {
> > > > + compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-v3s-csi";
> > > > + reg = <0x01cb4000 0x1000>;
> > >
> > > You use platform_get_resource_byname() to get this IO resource. This requires
> > > adding mandatory
> > >
> > > reg-names = "csi";
> > >
> > > But is it actually needed? Wouldn't a simple platform_get_resource() be
> > > enough?
> >
> > You are right.
> > This will be fixed in the next version.
> > I am waiting for more comments for the sunxi-csi.h. It's pleasure if
> > you have any suggestions about it.
>
> You mean sunxi_csi.h, right?
Yes. My spelling mistake.
>
> Why do you need the sunxi_csi_ops indirection? Do you expect to add
> alternative implementations of these ops at some point?
I want to seperate the sunxi_video.c and sunxi_csi_v3s.c.
sunxi_csi_v3s.c is Soc specific. Maybe there will be sunxi_csi_r40.c
in the futrue. But the sunxi_video.c and sunxi_csi.c are common.
>
> baruch
>
> --
> http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems
> =}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
> - baruch@...s.co.il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -
Thanks,
Yong
Powered by blists - more mailing lists