[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrVNWFpS7VKAK02Om6U3u3g5h0R4nBDJ02cbHmLKd7NKQw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 18:06:03 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/15] exec: Rename bprm->cred_prepared to called_set_creds
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> The cred_prepared bprm flag has a misleading name. It has nothing to do
> with the bprm_prepare_cred hook, and actually tracks if bprm_set_creds has
> been called. Rename this flag and improve its comment.
>
> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
> Cc: John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>
> Cc: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
> Cc: Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>
> Cc: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
> Cc: James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> ---
> fs/binfmt_flat.c | 2 +-
> fs/exec.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/binfmts.h | 8 ++++++--
> security/apparmor/domain.c | 2 +-
> security/selinux/hooks.c | 2 +-
> security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 2 +-
> security/tomoyo/tomoyo.c | 2 +-
> 7 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/binfmt_flat.c b/fs/binfmt_flat.c
> index 2edcefc0a294..a722530cc468 100644
> --- a/fs/binfmt_flat.c
> +++ b/fs/binfmt_flat.c
> @@ -885,7 +885,7 @@ static int load_flat_shared_library(int id, struct lib_info *libs)
> * as we're past the point of no return and are dealing with shared
> * libraries.
> */
> - bprm.cred_prepared = 1;
> + bprm.called_set_creds = 1;
WTF is this? It's not, strictly speaking, a bug in this patch, but
it's nonsensical. Is it fixed (presuably deleted) later?
Otherwise looks good.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists