[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOiHx==j=HhkWTthkHqDNpUMLEC0Y3MAkJY3ecR1H=hD-BLF6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 11:06:28 +0200
From: Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@...il.com>
To: Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] m68k: allow NULL clock for clk_get_rate
Hi Greg,
On 18 July 2017 at 14:03, Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> Hi Jonas,
>
> On 18/07/17 20:17, Jonas Gorski wrote:
>>
>> Make the behaviour of clk_get_rate consistent with common clk's
>> clk_get_rate by accepting NULL clocks as parameter. Some device
>> drivers rely on this, and will cause an OOPS otherwise.
>>
>> Fixes: facdf0ed4f59 ("m68knommu: introduce basic clk infrastructure")
>> Cc: Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>
>
>
> Acked-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>
>
> Do you want me to push this via the m68knommu git tree?
> Or are you (or someone) taking the series as a whole?
Please take it through your tree. I totally forgot mentioning in the
cover letter that I'm just a simple patch submitter and don't have my
own tree. Too long ago that I sent a multi-tree patch series last time
... .
Regards
Jonas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists