linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 7/7] PCI: dwc: qcom: Add support for IPQ8074 PCIe controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 19 Jul 2017 14:59:13 +0530
From:   Varadarajan Narayanan <varada@...eaurora.org>
To:     Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@...sol.com>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, kishon@...com,
        sboyd@...eaurora.org, vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org,
        fengguang.wu@...el.com, weiyongjun1@...wei.com,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        smuthayy <smuthayy@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] PCI: dwc: qcom: Add support for IPQ8074 PCIe
 controller

Stan,

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 10:12:45AM +0300, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 07/19/2017 09:49 AM, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 09:44:38AM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> >> On Tue 18 Jul 02:58 PDT 2017, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 03:07:18PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> >>>> On Mon 17 Jul 05:04 PDT 2017, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> >> [..]
> >>>>
> >>>> Can you confirm that this is actually version 4 of this block? Or are we
> >>>> just incrementing an arbitrary number here?
> >>>
> >>> This is not exactly the 4th version of the block. However, it is
> >>> a different version than the ones that are already supported in
> >>> this driver. Since the existing driver didn't exactly tie it with
> >>> the block IP version, I too followed the same versioning
> >>> convention.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Do you have a block IP version that you could base your numbering on, to
> >> break the trend? (We should go back and fix up the others as well)
> >
> > Presently, the driver supports the ipq8064, apq8064, apq8084,
> > msm8996, ipq4019 and ipq8074. The SoCs, qcom_pcie_ops version and
> > the block IP versions are as follows.
> >
> > 	ipq8064 - v0 - 2.1.0
> > 	apq8064 - v0 - 2.1.0
> > 	apq8084 - v1 - 1.0.0
> > 	msm8996 - v2 - 2.3.2
> > 	ipq4019 - v3 - 2.4.0
> > 	ipq8074 - v4 - 2.3.3
>
> That's nice, but I think we need the Synopsys IP versions too, can you
> provide such an information and after that we can decide how the names
> should look like.

Sorry, I posted v2 before I saw this e-mail. Will post v3 based
on what naming style is decided.

The SoCs, qcom_pcie_ops version, the block IP version and
Synopsys IP versions are as follows.

	ipq8064 - v0 - 2.1.0 - 4.01a
	apq8064 - v0 - 2.1.0 - 4.01a
	apq8084 - v1 - 1.0.0 - 4.11a
	msm8996 - v2 - 2.3.2 - 4.21a
	ipq4019 - v3 - 2.4.0 - 4.20a
	ipq8074 - v4 - 2.3.3 - 4.30a

Thanks
Varada

> > I will rename the qcom_pcie_ops structure and related functions
> > with the block IP version instead of vX numbering and post the
> > patch.
>
>
>
> regards,
> Stan

--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation