| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 11:44:07 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Andrei Vagin <avagin@...tuozzo.com>,
Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.12 61/84] mnt: In umount propagation reparent in a separate pass
4.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
commit 570487d3faf2a1d8a220e6ee10f472163123d7da upstream.
It was observed that in some pathlogical cases that the current code
does not unmount everything it should. After investigation it
was determined that the issue is that mnt_change_mntpoint can
can change which mounts are available to be unmounted during mount
propagation which is wrong.
The trivial reproducer is:
$ cat ./pathological.sh
mount -t tmpfs test-base /mnt
cd /mnt
mkdir 1 2 1/1
mount --bind 1 1
mount --make-shared 1
mount --bind 1 2
mount --bind 1/1 1/1
mount --bind 1/1 1/1
echo
grep test-base /proc/self/mountinfo
umount 1/1
echo
grep test-base /proc/self/mountinfo
$ unshare -Urm ./pathological.sh
The expected output looks like:
46 31 0:25 / /mnt rw,relatime - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
47 46 0:25 /1 /mnt/1 rw,relatime shared:1 - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
48 46 0:25 /1 /mnt/2 rw,relatime shared:1 - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
49 54 0:25 /1/1 /mnt/1/1 rw,relatime shared:1 - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
50 53 0:25 /1/1 /mnt/2/1 rw,relatime shared:1 - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
51 49 0:25 /1/1 /mnt/1/1 rw,relatime shared:1 - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
54 47 0:25 /1/1 /mnt/1/1 rw,relatime shared:1 - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
53 48 0:25 /1/1 /mnt/2/1 rw,relatime shared:1 - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
52 50 0:25 /1/1 /mnt/2/1 rw,relatime shared:1 - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
46 31 0:25 / /mnt rw,relatime - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
47 46 0:25 /1 /mnt/1 rw,relatime shared:1 - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
48 46 0:25 /1 /mnt/2 rw,relatime shared:1 - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
The output without the fix looks like:
46 31 0:25 / /mnt rw,relatime - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
47 46 0:25 /1 /mnt/1 rw,relatime shared:1 - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
48 46 0:25 /1 /mnt/2 rw,relatime shared:1 - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
49 54 0:25 /1/1 /mnt/1/1 rw,relatime shared:1 - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
50 53 0:25 /1/1 /mnt/2/1 rw,relatime shared:1 - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
51 49 0:25 /1/1 /mnt/1/1 rw,relatime shared:1 - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
54 47 0:25 /1/1 /mnt/1/1 rw,relatime shared:1 - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
53 48 0:25 /1/1 /mnt/2/1 rw,relatime shared:1 - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
52 50 0:25 /1/1 /mnt/2/1 rw,relatime shared:1 - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
46 31 0:25 / /mnt rw,relatime - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
47 46 0:25 /1 /mnt/1 rw,relatime shared:1 - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
48 46 0:25 /1 /mnt/2 rw,relatime shared:1 - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
52 48 0:25 /1/1 /mnt/2/1 rw,relatime shared:1 - tmpfs test-base rw,uid=1000,gid=1000
That last mount in the output was in the propgation tree to be unmounted but
was missed because the mnt_change_mountpoint changed it's parent before the walk
through the mount propagation tree observed it.
Fixes: 1064f874abc0 ("mnt: Tuck mounts under others instead of creating shadow/side mounts.")
Acked-by: Andrei Vagin <avagin@...tuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/mount.h | 1 +
fs/namespace.c | 1 +
fs/pnode.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/mount.h
+++ b/fs/mount.h
@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ struct mount {
struct mnt_namespace *mnt_ns; /* containing namespace */
struct mountpoint *mnt_mp; /* where is it mounted */
struct hlist_node mnt_mp_list; /* list mounts with the same mountpoint */
+ struct list_head mnt_reparent; /* reparent list entry */
#ifdef CONFIG_FSNOTIFY
struct fsnotify_mark_connector __rcu *mnt_fsnotify_marks;
__u32 mnt_fsnotify_mask;
--- a/fs/namespace.c
+++ b/fs/namespace.c
@@ -236,6 +236,7 @@ static struct mount *alloc_vfsmnt(const
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mnt->mnt_slave_list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mnt->mnt_slave);
INIT_HLIST_NODE(&mnt->mnt_mp_list);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mnt->mnt_reparent);
init_fs_pin(&mnt->mnt_umount, drop_mountpoint);
}
return mnt;
--- a/fs/pnode.c
+++ b/fs/pnode.c
@@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ static void mark_umount_candidates(struc
* NOTE: unmounting 'mnt' naturally propagates to all other mounts its
* parent propagates to.
*/
-static void __propagate_umount(struct mount *mnt)
+static void __propagate_umount(struct mount *mnt, struct list_head *to_reparent)
{
struct mount *parent = mnt->mnt_parent;
struct mount *m;
@@ -464,17 +464,38 @@ static void __propagate_umount(struct mo
*/
topper = find_topper(child);
if (topper)
- mnt_change_mountpoint(child->mnt_parent, child->mnt_mp,
- topper);
+ list_add_tail(&topper->mnt_reparent, to_reparent);
- if (list_empty(&child->mnt_mounts)) {
+ if (topper || list_empty(&child->mnt_mounts)) {
list_del_init(&child->mnt_child);
+ list_del_init(&child->mnt_reparent);
child->mnt.mnt_flags |= MNT_UMOUNT;
list_move_tail(&child->mnt_list, &mnt->mnt_list);
}
}
}
+static void reparent_mounts(struct list_head *to_reparent)
+{
+ while (!list_empty(to_reparent)) {
+ struct mount *mnt, *parent;
+ struct mountpoint *mp;
+
+ mnt = list_first_entry(to_reparent, struct mount, mnt_reparent);
+ list_del_init(&mnt->mnt_reparent);
+
+ /* Where should this mount be reparented to? */
+ mp = mnt->mnt_mp;
+ parent = mnt->mnt_parent;
+ while (parent->mnt.mnt_flags & MNT_UMOUNT) {
+ mp = parent->mnt_mp;
+ parent = parent->mnt_parent;
+ }
+
+ mnt_change_mountpoint(parent, mp, mnt);
+ }
+}
+
/*
* collect all mounts that receive propagation from the mount in @list,
* and return these additional mounts in the same list.
@@ -485,11 +506,15 @@ static void __propagate_umount(struct mo
int propagate_umount(struct list_head *list)
{
struct mount *mnt;
+ LIST_HEAD(to_reparent);
list_for_each_entry_reverse(mnt, list, mnt_list)
mark_umount_candidates(mnt);
list_for_each_entry(mnt, list, mnt_list)
- __propagate_umount(mnt);
+ __propagate_umount(mnt, &to_reparent);
+
+ reparent_mounts(&to_reparent);
+
return 0;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists