[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <32f70ccc-e52e-af86-87ec-f7a243d518b0@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 15:28:21 +0530
From: Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
CC: <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <nsekhar@...com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<fcooper@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] gpio: davinci: Use devm_gpiochip_add_data in place of
gpiochip_add_data
On Wednesday 19 July 2017 03:07 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 04:27:13PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
>> Use the devm version of gpiochip_add_data and pass on the
>> return value. Reset the static variables to 0 before returning.
>
> You need to describe not just what you do, but also why you it. In this
> case, your fixing memory leaks and the gpio chip being left registered
> if this driver is unbound.
Sure i can add more description as mentioned above.
>
> Johan
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists