linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] add support for Sama5d2 audio PLLs and enable ClassD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170719101946.keezbqmlrgt3waq6@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Wed, 19 Jul 2017 11:19:46 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:     mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...eaurora.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, lgirdwood@...il.com,
        nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com,
        linux@...linux.org.uk, boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com,
        perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com, cyrille.pitchen@...ev4u.fr,
        thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] add support for Sama5d2 audio PLLs and enable
 ClassD

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 08:28:17AM +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> It's been almost a week with no comments on this patch set, so kindly
> pinging.

Please don't top post, reply in line with needed context.  This allows
readers to readily follow the flow of conversation and understand what
you are talking about and also helps ensure that everything in the
discussion is being addressed.

Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time
for review.  People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so 
on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes)
please allow at least a couple of weeks for review.  If there have been
review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed.

Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at
all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed
directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches
anyway, though there are some other maintainers who like them - if in
doubt look at how patches for the subsystem are normally handled.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)