linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 25/72] sfc: dont read beyond unicast address list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170719102439.897641735@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed, 19 Jul 2017 12:24:19 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Bert Kenward <bkenward@...arflare.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 25/72] sfc: dont read beyond unicast address list

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Bert Kenward <bkenward@...arflare.com>


[ Upstream commit c70d68150f71b84cea6997a53493e17bf18a54db ]

If we have more than 32 unicast MAC addresses assigned to an interface
we will read beyond the end of the address table in the driver when
adding filters. The next 256 entries store multicast addresses, so we
will end up attempting to insert duplicate filters, which is mostly
harmless. If we add more than 288 unicast addresses we will then read
past the multicast address table, which is likely to be more exciting.

Fixes: 12fb0da45c9a ("sfc: clean fallbacks between promisc/normal in efx_ef10_filter_sync_rx_mode")
Signed-off-by: Bert Kenward <bkenward@...arflare.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c |    8 +++-----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c
@@ -4399,12 +4399,9 @@ static void efx_ef10_filter_uc_addr_list
 	struct efx_ef10_filter_table *table = efx->filter_state;
 	struct net_device *net_dev = efx->net_dev;
 	struct netdev_hw_addr *uc;
-	int addr_count;
 	unsigned int i;
 
-	addr_count = netdev_uc_count(net_dev);
 	table->uc_promisc = !!(net_dev->flags & IFF_PROMISC);
-	table->dev_uc_count = 1 + addr_count;
 	ether_addr_copy(table->dev_uc_list[0].addr, net_dev->dev_addr);
 	i = 1;
 	netdev_for_each_uc_addr(uc, net_dev) {
@@ -4415,6 +4412,8 @@ static void efx_ef10_filter_uc_addr_list
 		ether_addr_copy(table->dev_uc_list[i].addr, uc->addr);
 		i++;
 	}
+
+	table->dev_uc_count = i;
 }
 
 static void efx_ef10_filter_mc_addr_list(struct efx_nic *efx)
@@ -4422,11 +4421,10 @@ static void efx_ef10_filter_mc_addr_list
 	struct efx_ef10_filter_table *table = efx->filter_state;
 	struct net_device *net_dev = efx->net_dev;
 	struct netdev_hw_addr *mc;
-	unsigned int i, addr_count;
+	unsigned int i;
 
 	table->mc_promisc = !!(net_dev->flags & (IFF_PROMISC | IFF_ALLMULTI));
 
-	addr_count = netdev_mc_count(net_dev);
 	i = 0;
 	netdev_for_each_mc_addr(mc, net_dev) {
 		if (i >= EFX_EF10_FILTER_DEV_MC_MAX) {