[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <675744d3-b070-1245-6ebc-579c4b5f4a75@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 11:58:04 +0100
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To: Anup Patel <anup.patel@...adcom.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Baptiste Reynal <b.reynal@...tualopensystems.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc: Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] iommu: Add capability IOMMU_CAP_BYPASS
On 19/07/17 10:33, Anup Patel wrote:
> Some of the IOMMUs (such as ARM SMMU) are capable of bypassing
> transactions for which no IOMMU domain is configured.
>
> This patch adds IOMMU_CAP_BYPASS which can be used by IOMMU
> drivers to advertise transation bypass capability of an IOMMU.
Whatever the intended semantics of this are, I can't help thinking it
would be better served by allowing callers to explicitly allocate their
own IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY domains. That would also be useful for the
problem we have with legacy virtio devices behind real IOMMUs.
Robin.
> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@...adcom.com>
> ---
> include/linux/iommu.h | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/iommu.h b/include/linux/iommu.h
> index 2cb54ad..6bbb4cc 100644
> --- a/include/linux/iommu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/iommu.h
> @@ -101,6 +101,10 @@ enum iommu_cap {
> transactions */
> IOMMU_CAP_INTR_REMAP, /* IOMMU supports interrupt isolation */
> IOMMU_CAP_NOEXEC, /* IOMMU_NOEXEC flag */
> + IOMMU_CAP_BYPASS, /*
> + * IOMMU can bypass transactions for
> + * which domain is not configured
> + */
> };
>
> /*
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists