[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <9881f4ae2afb2cd671715bcd1fcb9035688c40c9.1500464394.git.michal.simek@xilinx.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 13:39:57 +0200
From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, monstr@...str.eu
Cc: Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>,
linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] rtc: zynqmp: Disable the build as a module
The patch:
"timers: Introduce in-kernel alarm-timer interface"
(sha1: ff3ead96d17f47ee70c294a5cc2cce9b61e82f0f)
introduced new requirement that RTC drivers with alarm functionality
can't be used as a module.
When module is unloaded there is still a reference that's why
rtc_device_release() is not called and ida is not freed.
That's why when module is loaded again it can't use the same RTC number
based on aliases.
Log:
sh-4.3# modprobe rtc-zynqmp
[ 42.468565] rtc_zynqmp ffa60000.rtc: rtc core: registered
ffa60000.rtc as rtc5
sh-4.3# rmmod rtc-zynqmp
sh-4.3# modprobe rtc-zynqmp
[ 48.648222] rtc_zynqmp ffa60000.rtc: /aliases ID 5 not available
[ 48.654280] rtc_zynqmp ffa60000.rtc: rtc core: registered
ffa60000.rtc as rtc0
This patch is removing module support which is just a workaround till
alarm-timer interface is fixed to support device releasing when alarm
timer is not used.
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
---
Based on discussion:
https://www.mail-archive.com/rtc-linux@googlegroups.com/msg00908.html
---
drivers/rtc/Kconfig | 2 +-
drivers/rtc/rtc-zynqmp.c | 15 +--------------
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/Kconfig b/drivers/rtc/Kconfig
index 72419ac2c52a..a2bbe7c2cf92 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/rtc/Kconfig
@@ -1225,7 +1225,7 @@ config RTC_DRV_OPAL
will be called rtc-opal.
config RTC_DRV_ZYNQMP
- tristate "Xilinx Zynq Ultrascale+ MPSoC RTC"
+ bool "Xilinx Zynq Ultrascale+ MPSoC RTC"
depends on OF
help
If you say yes here you get support for the RTC controller found on
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-zynqmp.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-zynqmp.c
index da18a8ae3c1d..5fc50145dbd2 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-zynqmp.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-zynqmp.c
@@ -268,14 +268,6 @@ static int xlnx_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(xrtcdev->rtc);
}
-static int xlnx_rtc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
-{
- xlnx_rtc_alarm_irq_enable(&pdev->dev, 0);
- device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, 0);
-
- return 0;
-}
-
static int __maybe_unused xlnx_rtc_suspend(struct device *dev)
{
struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
@@ -312,7 +304,6 @@ static int __maybe_unused xlnx_rtc_resume(struct device *dev)
static struct platform_driver xlnx_rtc_driver = {
.probe = xlnx_rtc_probe,
- .remove = xlnx_rtc_remove,
.driver = {
.name = KBUILD_MODNAME,
.pm = &xlnx_rtc_pm_ops,
@@ -320,8 +311,4 @@ static int __maybe_unused xlnx_rtc_resume(struct device *dev)
},
};
-module_platform_driver(xlnx_rtc_driver);
-
-MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Xilinx Zynq MPSoC RTC driver");
-MODULE_AUTHOR("Xilinx Inc.");
-MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
+builtin_platform_driver(xlnx_rtc_driver);
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists