[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170719141659.GB15908@quack2.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 16:16:59 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] mm: add vm_insert_mixed_mkwrite()
On Wed 28-06-17 16:01:48, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> To be able to use the common 4k zero page in DAX we need to have our PTE
> fault path look more like our PMD fault path where a PTE entry can be
> marked as dirty and writeable as it is first inserted, rather than waiting
> for a follow-up dax_pfn_mkwrite() => finish_mkwrite_fault() call.
>
> Right now we can rely on having a dax_pfn_mkwrite() call because we can
> distinguish between these two cases in do_wp_page():
>
> case 1: 4k zero page => writable DAX storage
> case 2: read-only DAX storage => writeable DAX storage
>
> This distinction is made by via vm_normal_page(). vm_normal_page() returns
> false for the common 4k zero page, though, just as it does for DAX ptes.
> Instead of special casing the DAX + 4k zero page case, we will simplify our
> DAX PTE page fault sequence so that it matches our DAX PMD sequence, and
> get rid of dax_pfn_mkwrite() completely.
>
> This means that insert_pfn() needs to follow the lead of insert_pfn_pmd()
> and allow us to pass in a 'mkwrite' flag. If 'mkwrite' is set insert_pfn()
> will do the work that was previously done by wp_page_reuse() as part of the
> dax_pfn_mkwrite() call path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
Just one small comment below.
> @@ -1658,14 +1658,26 @@ static int insert_pfn(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> if (!pte)
> goto out;
> retval = -EBUSY;
> - if (!pte_none(*pte))
> - goto out_unlock;
> + if (!pte_none(*pte)) {
> + if (mkwrite) {
> + entry = *pte;
> + goto out_mkwrite;
Can we maybe check here that (pte_pfn(*pte) == pfn_t_to_pfn(pfn)) and
return -EBUSY otherwise? That way we are sure insert_pfn() isn't doing
anything we don't expect and if I understand the code right, we need to
invalidate all zero page mappings at given file offset (via
unmap_mapping_range()) before mapping an allocated block there and thus the
case of filling the hole won't be affected by this?
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists