[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170720041950.GB14367@nazgul.tnic>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 06:19:50 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Aristeu Rozanski <aris@...hat.com>
Cc: "Kani, Toshimitsu" <toshi.kani@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
"rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com"
<srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
"tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ghes_edac: add platform check to enable ghes_edac
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 02:55:08PM -0400, Aristeu Rozanski wrote:
> That would also need to keep an eye on versions. A newer version of BIOS
> on a whitelisted platform might be broken.
Yeah, that would be a nasty, back-stabbing SNAFU.
So I'm thinking of adding a bunch of FW_ERR sanity checks to that whole
ghes_edac and ghes init code to hopefully catch issues during platform
validation. I.e., early enough for them to get fixed.
But that's the same problem as with UEFI - vendors need to try to boot
Linux on their platforms early enough.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists