linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/1] acpi: apei: Enable APEI multiple GHES source to share an single external IRQ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170720044936.GA14552@nazgul.tnic>
Date:   Thu, 20 Jul 2017 06:49:36 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To:     Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@...eaurora.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] acpi: apei: Enable APEI multiple GHES source to
 share an single external IRQ

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 04:05:21PM -0400, Mark Salter wrote:
> Yes, I should have included Boris. The last time this came up, Boris
> said it was up to you. :)
> 
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-January/401772.html

/me goes back and reads the old emails.

So I had some issues with how acpi_gsi_to_irq() returns the irq number
but that required more involved simplification and the submitter was
unsurprisingly reluctant to do it.

That's why it was Rafael's call.

AFAIR.

Also, from looking at the patches, the SOB chain is wrong:

Signed-off-by: Tuan Phan <tphan@....com>
Signed-off-by: Loc Ho <lho@....com>

I don't know from that who's the author and who's the submitter.
SubmittingPatches has more info on the whole deal.

So please resubmit updated versions with issues addressed.

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--