[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170720091538.GB27647@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 11:15:38 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
"K . Y . Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] x86/hyper-v: add missing void return type to
hyperv_cleanup declaration
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 10:52:36AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> >
> > Add in missing void return type, fixes sparse warning:
> > "warning: 'hyperv_cleanup()' has implicit return type"
> >
> > Fixes: 2e252fbf777d ("x86/hyper-v: include hyperv/ only when CONFIG_HYPERV is set")
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h
> > index 01b9c0fb3aab..41fae263f8fa 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h
> > @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ void hyperv_cleanup(void);
> > #else /* CONFIG_HYPERV */
> > static inline void hyperv_init(void) {}
> > static inline bool hv_is_hypercall_page_setup(void) { return false; }
> > -static inline hyperv_cleanup(void) {}
> > +static inline void hyperv_cleanup(void) {}
> > #endif /* CONFIG_HYPERV */
>
> Guys, Greg, could we please move this commit from the drivers tree:
>
> 2e252fbf777d: x86/hyper-v: include hyperv/ only when CONFIG_HYPERV is set
>
> arch/x86/Kbuild | 2 +-
> arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h | 7 ++++++-
>
> ... to the x86 tree where it belongs?
I've now reverted it from my tree entirely, sorry about that.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists