lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170720111733.vjn3i2s3shzf7u4d@mwanda>
Date:   Thu, 20 Jul 2017 14:17:34 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Bogdan Purcareata <bogdan.purcareata@....com>
Cc:     ruxandra.radulescu@....com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: fsl-dpaa2/eth: Fix skb use after free

On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 10:58:37AM +0000, Bogdan Purcareata wrote:
> Once a Tx frame descriptor is enqueued, an interrupt might be triggered
> to process the Tx confirmation and free the skb, hitting a memory use
> after free when updating the tx_bytes statistic based on skb->len.
> 
> Use the frame descriptor length instead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bogdan Purcareata <bogdan.purcareata@....com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/fsl-dpaa2/ethernet/dpaa2-eth.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/fsl-dpaa2/ethernet/dpaa2-eth.c b/drivers/staging/fsl-dpaa2/ethernet/dpaa2-eth.c
> index b9a0a31..0f3e497 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/fsl-dpaa2/ethernet/dpaa2-eth.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/fsl-dpaa2/ethernet/dpaa2-eth.c
> @@ -616,7 +616,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t dpaa2_eth_tx(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *net_dev)
>  		free_tx_fd(priv, &fd, NULL);
>  	} else {
>  		percpu_stats->tx_packets++;
> -		percpu_stats->tx_bytes += skb->len;
> +		percpu_stats->tx_bytes += dpaa2_fd_get_len(&fd);

This feels like the wrong thing.  Can't we just save skb->len earlier
in the function and use it here?  This is the common case right?  So
we'd be saving slightly wrong information for almost every packet.

regards,
dan carpenter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ