linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] provide power off support for iMX6 with external PMIC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 20 Jul 2017 14:12:12 +0100
From:   Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Oleksij Rempel <ore@...gutronix.de>,
        Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
        kernel@...gutronix.de, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] provide power off support for iMX6 with external
 PMIC

On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 01:37:01PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 06:53:54AM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > Hallo all,
> > 
> > Here Gentle Ping to the Old King
> > 
> > DT is already ACKed.
> 
> Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time
> for review.  People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so 
> on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes)
> please allow at least a couple of weeks for review.  If there have been
> review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed.
> 
> Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at
> all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed
> directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches
> anyway, though there are some other maintainers who like them - if in
> doubt look at how patches for the subsystem are normally handled.

It also doesn't help that there's little context about who Oleksij is
expecting a reply from.  There's 11 individuals in the To: header.
Is the reference above refering to me?  Shrug, I don't know.  I doubt
it because I'm not maintaining the imx6 SoC support.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.