lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3872d014-7782-eac1-29ce-098d7e70ae07@arm.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 Jul 2017 14:48:58 +0100
From:   Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To:     Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux@...linux.org.uk,
        sza@....hu, arnd@...db.de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alexandre.torgue@...com,
        kbuild-all@...org, benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org, hch@....de,
        m.szyprowski@...sung.com, vitaly_kuzmichev@...tor.com,
        george_davis@...tor.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: NOMMU: Wire-up default DMA interface

On 20/07/17 11:19, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
> The way how default DMA pool is exposed has changed and now we need to
> use dedicated interface to work with it. This patch makes alloc/release
> operations to use such interface. Since, default DMA pool is not
> handled by generic code anymore we have to implement our own mmap
> operation.
> 
> Tested-by: Andras Szemzo <sza@....hu>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@....com>

Looks like the right thing to do :)

Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>

> ---
>  arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping-nommu.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping-nommu.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping-nommu.c
> index 90ee354..6db5fc2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping-nommu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping-nommu.c
> @@ -40,9 +40,21 @@ static void *arm_nommu_dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>  
>  {
>  	const struct dma_map_ops *ops = &dma_noop_ops;
> +	void *ret;
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * We are here because:
> +	 * Try generic allocator first if we are advertised that
> +	 * consistency is not required.
> +	 */
> +
> +	if (attrs & DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT)
> +		return ops->alloc(dev, size, dma_handle, gfp, attrs);
> +
> +	ret = dma_alloc_from_global_coherent(size, dma_handle);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * dma_alloc_from_global_coherent() may fail because:
> +	 *
>  	 * - no consistent DMA region has been defined, so we can't
>  	 *   continue.
>  	 * - there is no space left in consistent DMA region, so we
> @@ -50,11 +62,8 @@ static void *arm_nommu_dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>  	 *   advertised that consistency is not required.
>  	 */
>  
> -	if (attrs & DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT)
> -		return ops->alloc(dev, size, dma_handle, gfp, attrs);
> -
> -	WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> -	return NULL;
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(ret == NULL);
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  static void arm_nommu_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size,
> @@ -63,14 +72,31 @@ static void arm_nommu_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>  {
>  	const struct dma_map_ops *ops = &dma_noop_ops;
>  
> -	if (attrs & DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT)
> +	if (attrs & DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT) {
>  		ops->free(dev, size, cpu_addr, dma_addr, attrs);
> -	else
> -		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> +	} else {
> +		int ret = dma_release_from_global_coherent(get_order(size),
> +							   cpu_addr);
> +
> +		WARN_ON_ONCE(ret == 0);
> +	}
>  
>  	return;
>  }
>  
> +static int arm_nommu_dma_mmap(struct device *dev, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> +			      void *cpu_addr, dma_addr_t dma_addr, size_t size,
> +			      unsigned long attrs)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (dma_mmap_from_global_coherent(vma, cpu_addr, size, &ret))
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	return dma_common_mmap(dev, vma, cpu_addr, dma_addr, size);
> +}
> +
> +
>  static void __dma_page_cpu_to_dev(phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size,
>  				  enum dma_data_direction dir)
>  {
> @@ -173,6 +199,7 @@ static void arm_nommu_dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist
>  const struct dma_map_ops arm_nommu_dma_ops = {
>  	.alloc			= arm_nommu_dma_alloc,
>  	.free			= arm_nommu_dma_free,
> +	.mmap			= arm_nommu_dma_mmap,
>  	.map_page		= arm_nommu_dma_map_page,
>  	.unmap_page		= arm_nommu_dma_unmap_page,
>  	.map_sg			= arm_nommu_dma_map_sg,
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ