[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3872d014-7782-eac1-29ce-098d7e70ae07@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 14:48:58 +0100
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux@...linux.org.uk,
sza@....hu, arnd@...db.de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alexandre.torgue@...com,
kbuild-all@...org, benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org, hch@....de,
m.szyprowski@...sung.com, vitaly_kuzmichev@...tor.com,
george_davis@...tor.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: NOMMU: Wire-up default DMA interface
On 20/07/17 11:19, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
> The way how default DMA pool is exposed has changed and now we need to
> use dedicated interface to work with it. This patch makes alloc/release
> operations to use such interface. Since, default DMA pool is not
> handled by generic code anymore we have to implement our own mmap
> operation.
>
> Tested-by: Andras Szemzo <sza@....hu>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@....com>
Looks like the right thing to do :)
Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping-nommu.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping-nommu.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping-nommu.c
> index 90ee354..6db5fc2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping-nommu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping-nommu.c
> @@ -40,9 +40,21 @@ static void *arm_nommu_dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>
> {
> const struct dma_map_ops *ops = &dma_noop_ops;
> + void *ret;
>
> /*
> - * We are here because:
> + * Try generic allocator first if we are advertised that
> + * consistency is not required.
> + */
> +
> + if (attrs & DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT)
> + return ops->alloc(dev, size, dma_handle, gfp, attrs);
> +
> + ret = dma_alloc_from_global_coherent(size, dma_handle);
> +
> + /*
> + * dma_alloc_from_global_coherent() may fail because:
> + *
> * - no consistent DMA region has been defined, so we can't
> * continue.
> * - there is no space left in consistent DMA region, so we
> @@ -50,11 +62,8 @@ static void *arm_nommu_dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size,
> * advertised that consistency is not required.
> */
>
> - if (attrs & DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT)
> - return ops->alloc(dev, size, dma_handle, gfp, attrs);
> -
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> - return NULL;
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(ret == NULL);
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static void arm_nommu_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size,
> @@ -63,14 +72,31 @@ static void arm_nommu_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size,
> {
> const struct dma_map_ops *ops = &dma_noop_ops;
>
> - if (attrs & DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT)
> + if (attrs & DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT) {
> ops->free(dev, size, cpu_addr, dma_addr, attrs);
> - else
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> + } else {
> + int ret = dma_release_from_global_coherent(get_order(size),
> + cpu_addr);
> +
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(ret == 0);
> + }
>
> return;
> }
>
> +static int arm_nommu_dma_mmap(struct device *dev, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> + void *cpu_addr, dma_addr_t dma_addr, size_t size,
> + unsigned long attrs)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (dma_mmap_from_global_coherent(vma, cpu_addr, size, &ret))
> + return ret;
> +
> + return dma_common_mmap(dev, vma, cpu_addr, dma_addr, size);
> +}
> +
> +
> static void __dma_page_cpu_to_dev(phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size,
> enum dma_data_direction dir)
> {
> @@ -173,6 +199,7 @@ static void arm_nommu_dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist
> const struct dma_map_ops arm_nommu_dma_ops = {
> .alloc = arm_nommu_dma_alloc,
> .free = arm_nommu_dma_free,
> + .mmap = arm_nommu_dma_mmap,
> .map_page = arm_nommu_dma_map_page,
> .unmap_page = arm_nommu_dma_unmap_page,
> .map_sg = arm_nommu_dma_map_sg,
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists