[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5j+mFMRKhjSwkzYZ1qMDCoD44g42wYpLBPm3m2Zjq5BwNA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 10:06:39 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Cc: Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/15] selinux: Refactor to remove bprm_secureexec hook
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 6:42 AM, Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com> wrote:
> Alternatively, if you've got a fairly recent git repo with all the
> patches merged I can build a test kernel and give it a shot for you,
> although fair warning it may take a day or two for me to get to it.
Hurm, I think this will take quite a bit of time for me to set up. :P
If you have a chance, I'd appreciate it if you could test the series.
It's currently based on v4.12:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux.git/log/?h=kspp/setuid-rlimits/secureexec-no-hook
If it doesn't work out or takes too much time I can work on setting up
the test environment next week (travelling at the moment).
Thanks for the details!
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists