linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] platform/x86: Add GLK PSS Event Table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170720210627.GC16076@fury>
Date:   Thu, 20 Jul 2017 14:06:27 -0700
From:   Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
To:     "Chakravarty, Souvik K" <souvik.k.chakravarty@...el.com>
Cc:     "Bhardwaj, Rajneesh" <rajneesh.bhardwaj@...el.com>,
        "platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org" 
        <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        "andy@...radead.org" <andy@...radead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Murthy, Shanth" <shanth.murthy@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] platform/x86: Add GLK PSS Event Table

On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 05:18:54AM +0000, Chakravarty, Souvik K wrote:
> +1 From me.

Souvik, as the listed maintainer for this driver, what I require from
you is a complete Acked-by or a Reviewed-by line, preferably the latter,
and preferably after an actual review with comments. +1 has no semantic
meaning in the Linux kernel development process, and one line approvals,
especially from the same company, have little incremental value.

For details, please see:
Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst
Documentation/submitting-patches.rst

Thanks,

-- 
Darren Hart
VMware Open Source Technology Center