linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: ioatdma: Fix error handling path in 'ioat_dma_self

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1707210923370.4676@hadrien>
Date:   Fri, 21 Jul 2017 09:23:54 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To:     walter harms <wharms@....de>
cc:     Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
        Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
        "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        "Koul, Vinod" <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
        "dmaengine@...r.kernel.org" <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: ioatdma: Fix error handling path in
 'ioat_dma_self_test()'



On Fri, 21 Jul 2017, walter harms wrote:

>
>
> Am 20.07.2017 18:56, schrieb Dave Jiang:
> >
> >
> > On 07/20/2017 12:24 AM, walter harms wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 20.07.2017 00:16, schrieb Christophe JAILLET:
> >>> If the 'memcmp' fails, free allocated resources as done in all other
> >>> error handling paths.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
> >>> ---
> >>> Please review carefully, this patch looks "too obvious" to me!
> >>> ---
> >>>  drivers/dma/ioat/init.c | 2 +-
> >>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/ioat/init.c b/drivers/dma/ioat/init.c
> >>> index ed8ed1192775..948fc1f8fb5c 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/dma/ioat/init.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/dma/ioat/init.c
> >>> @@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ static int ioat_dma_self_test(struct ioatdma_device *ioat_dma)
> >>>  	if (memcmp(src, dest, IOAT_TEST_SIZE)) {
> >>>  		dev_err(dev, "Self-test copy failed compare, disabling\n");
> >>>  		err = -ENODEV;
> >>> -		goto free_resources;
> >>> +		goto unmap_dma;
> >>>  	}
> >>>
> >>>  unmap_dma:
> >>
> >> ^^^^^^^^^^
> >>
> >>
> >> is the goto needed at all ?
> >
> > It's not. However, it may be better to stay there if we happen to add
> > additional code after the if block later on and guard against mistakes.
> > At least IMO.
> >
>
> If you are happy with that ... its not a big problem. The compiler will
> eat that goto anyway but it is unusual so be prepared that other people
> may send patches.

I agree with Walter.

julia


>
> re,
>  wh
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>