[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2301545.dlea0HVRYo@phil>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 11:35:23 +0200
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: David Wu <david.wu@...k-chips.com>
Cc: linus.walleij@...aro.org, huangtao@...k-chips.com,
dianders@...omium.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: rockchip: Use common interface for recalced iomux
Am Freitag, 21. Juli 2017, 14:27:14 CEST schrieb David Wu:
> The other Socs also need the feature of recalced iomux, so
> make it as a common interface like iomux route feature.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@...k-chips.com>
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c
> index e831647..fd4e491 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c
> @@ -76,7 +76,6 @@ enum rockchip_pinctrl_type {
> #define IOMUX_SOURCE_PMU BIT(2)
> #define IOMUX_UNROUTED BIT(3)
> #define IOMUX_WIDTH_3BIT BIT(4)
> -#define IOMUX_RECALCED BIT(5)
very cool to see this flag go away and simply calculating the affected
bits is obviously a way nicer solution.
Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Thanks for that cleanup
Heiko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists