[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170721101831.wzvmuqrkq5l4kgfk@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 12:18:31 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [GIT PULL] scheduler fixes
Linus,
Please pull the latest sched-urgent-for-linus git tree from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git sched-urgent-for-linus
# HEAD: 193be41e33168a3a06eb9d356d9e39c69de161d2 sched/deadline: Fix confusing comments about selection of top pi-waiter
A cputime fix and code comments/organization fix to the deadline scheduler.
Thanks,
Ingo
------------------>
Joel Fernandes (1):
sched/deadline: Fix confusing comments about selection of top pi-waiter
Wanpeng Li (1):
sched/cputime: Don't use smp_processor_id() in preemptible context
kernel/sched/cputime.c | 6 +++---
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 14 ++++++++------
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cputime.c b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
index 6e3ea4ac1bda..14d2dbf97c53 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cputime.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
@@ -683,7 +683,7 @@ static u64 vtime_delta(struct vtime *vtime)
{
unsigned long long clock;
- clock = sched_clock_cpu(smp_processor_id());
+ clock = sched_clock();
if (clock < vtime->starttime)
return 0;
@@ -814,7 +814,7 @@ void arch_vtime_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev)
write_seqcount_begin(&vtime->seqcount);
vtime->state = VTIME_SYS;
- vtime->starttime = sched_clock_cpu(smp_processor_id());
+ vtime->starttime = sched_clock();
write_seqcount_end(&vtime->seqcount);
}
@@ -826,7 +826,7 @@ void vtime_init_idle(struct task_struct *t, int cpu)
local_irq_save(flags);
write_seqcount_begin(&vtime->seqcount);
vtime->state = VTIME_SYS;
- vtime->starttime = sched_clock_cpu(cpu);
+ vtime->starttime = sched_clock();
write_seqcount_end(&vtime->seqcount);
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index a84299f44b5d..755bd3f1a1a9 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -1392,17 +1392,19 @@ static void enqueue_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
struct sched_dl_entity *pi_se = &p->dl;
/*
- * Use the scheduling parameters of the top pi-waiter
- * task if we have one and its (absolute) deadline is
- * smaller than our one... OTW we keep our runtime and
- * deadline.
+ * Use the scheduling parameters of the top pi-waiter task if:
+ * - we have a top pi-waiter which is a SCHED_DEADLINE task AND
+ * - our dl_boosted is set (i.e. the pi-waiter's (absolute) deadline is
+ * smaller than our deadline OR we are a !SCHED_DEADLINE task getting
+ * boosted due to a SCHED_DEADLINE pi-waiter).
+ * Otherwise we keep our runtime and deadline.
*/
- if (pi_task && p->dl.dl_boosted && dl_prio(pi_task->normal_prio)) {
+ if (pi_task && dl_prio(pi_task->normal_prio) && p->dl.dl_boosted) {
pi_se = &pi_task->dl;
} else if (!dl_prio(p->normal_prio)) {
/*
* Special case in which we have a !SCHED_DEADLINE task
- * that is going to be deboosted, but exceedes its
+ * that is going to be deboosted, but exceeds its
* runtime while doing so. No point in replenishing
* it, as it's going to return back to its original
* scheduling class after this.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists