[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m3lgnif09q.fsf@t19.piap.pl>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 14:21:53 +0200
From: khalasa@...p.pl (Krzysztof HaĆasa)
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Imre Kaloz <kaloz@...nwrt.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] ARM: ixp4xx: fix ioport_unmap definition
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> writes:
> An empty macro definition can cause unexpected behavior, in
> case of the ixp4xx ioport_unmap, we get two warnings:
>
> drivers/net/wireless/marvell/libertas/if_cs.c: In function 'if_cs_release':
> drivers/net/wireless/marvell/libertas/if_cs.c:826:3: error: suggest braces around empty body in an 'if' statement [-Werror=empty-body]
> ioport_unmap(card->iobase);
> drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_rdwr.c: In function 'vfio_pci_vga_rw':
> drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_rdwr.c:230:15: error: the omitted middle operand in ?: will always be 'true', suggest explicit middle operand [-Werror=parentheses]
> is_ioport ? ioport_unmap(iomem) : iounmap(iomem);
>
> This uses an inline function to define the macro in a safer way.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/io.h | 11 +++++++++--
Acked-by: Krzysztof Halasa <khalasa@...p.pl>
In fact, the old code contained another bug (missing parentheses):
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/io.h
>
> -#define ioport_map(port, nr) ((void __iomem*)(port + PIO_OFFSET))
^^^^
--
Krzysztof Halasa
Industrial Research Institute for Automation and Measurements PIAP
Al. Jerozolimskie 202, 02-486 Warsaw, Poland
Powered by blists - more mailing lists