[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170721104001.3cd2b884@vento.lan>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 10:40:01 -0300
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: "Kani, Toshimitsu" <toshi.kani@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
"rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com"
<srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
"tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ghes_edac: add platform check to enable ghes_edac
Em Fri, 21 Jul 2017 15:34:41 +0200
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> escreveu:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 07:50:03PM +0000, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> > GHES / firmware-first still requires OS recovery actions when an error
> > cannot be corrected by the platform. They are handled by ghes_proc(),
> > and ghes_edac remains its error-reporting wrapper.
What happens when the error can be corrected? Does it still report it to
userspace, or just silently hide the error?
If I remember well about a past discussion with some vendor, I was told
that the firmware can hide some errors from being reported. Is it
still the case?
Thanks,
Mauro
Powered by blists - more mailing lists