[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170721101148.4b20f55e@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 10:11:48 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>
Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-misc tree with the
drm-intel tree
Hi all,
The following conflict now exists between the drm and drm-intel trees.
On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 11:23:33 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the drm-misc tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 99c539bef538 ("drm/i915: unregister interfaces first in unload")
>
> from the drm-intel tree and commit:
>
> baf54385af78 ("drm/i915: Drop drm_vblank_cleanup")
>
> from the drm-misc tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> index f406aec8a499,04d9bd84ee43..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> @@@ -1386,8 -1367,8 +1384,6 @@@ void i915_driver_unload(struct drm_devi
>
> intel_gvt_cleanup(dev_priv);
>
> - drm_vblank_cleanup(dev);
> - i915_driver_unregister(dev_priv);
> --
> intel_modeset_cleanup(dev);
>
> /*
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Powered by blists - more mailing lists