[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1500649162.2042.43.camel@hpe.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 15:08:41 +0000
From: "Kani, Toshimitsu" <toshi.kani@....com>
To: "mchehab@...pensource.com" <mchehab@...pensource.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
"rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com"
<srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
"tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ghes_edac: add platform check to enable ghes_edac
On Fri, 2017-07-21 at 15:47 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 10:40:01AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> wrote:
> > What happens when the error can be corrected? Does it still report
> > it to userspace, or just silently hide the error?
> >
> > If I remember well about a past discussion with some vendor, I was
> > told that the firmware can hide some errors from being reported. Is
> > it still the case?
>
> I've heard the same thing but I have no idea what they're actually
> doing. But it would make sense because the intention is not to worry
> users unnecessarily if it can hide the error and if there are no
> adverse consequences from it.
Yes, that is correct. Corrected errors are reported to the OS when
they exceeded the platform's threshold.
Thanks,
-Toshi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists