linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] firmware: Convert to using %pOF instead of full

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 21 Jul 2017 17:03:01 +0100
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, arm@...nel.org
Cc:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: Convert to using %pOF instead of full_name



On 18/07/17 22:43, Rob Herring wrote:
> Now that we have a custom printf format specifier, convert users of
> full_name to use %pOF instead. This is preparation to remove storing
> of the full path string for each node.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> ---
>  drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c | 2 +-
>  drivers/firmware/psci.c     | 4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c
> index 8043e51de897..59190c374696 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c
> @@ -965,7 +965,7 @@ static int scpi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> 
>  	count = of_count_phandle_with_args(np, "mboxes", "#mbox-cells");
>  	if (count < 0) {
> -		dev_err(dev, "no mboxes property in '%s'\n", np->full_name);
> +		dev_err(dev, "no mboxes property in '%pOF'\n", np);
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  	}
> 

(For the SCPI part)
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>

I assume you will ask ARM-SoC guys to pick this up. Let us know if you
think otherwise.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep