linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 04/15] selinux: Refactor to remove bprm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGXu5jLT1V_=9Hh-DDJJqvf9Z7ZeaCpLbXnLLZ-e+JTQb2u99w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 21 Jul 2017 10:37:24 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Cc:     Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
        James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/15] selinux: Refactor to remove bprm_secureexec hook

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 6:42 AM, Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com> wrote:
>>>> Alternatively, if you've got a fairly recent git repo with all the
>>>> patches merged I can build a test kernel and give it a shot for you,
>>>> although fair warning it may take a day or two for me to get to it.
>>>
>>> Hurm, I think this will take quite a bit of time for me to set up. :P
>>> If you have a chance, I'd appreciate it if you could test the series.
>>> It's currently based on v4.12:
>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux.git/log/?h=kspp/setuid-rlimits/secureexec-no-hook
>>>
>>> If it doesn't work out or takes too much time I can work on setting up
>>> the test environment next week (travelling at the moment).
>>
>> Building a kernel now, in case anyone on Fedora wants to play with it,
>> you can find it here (when it finishes):
>>
>> * https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/pcmoore/kernel-testing/build/581947
>
> Quick follow up, the kernel above passes the selinux-testsuite atsecure test.

Awesome, thanks for taking the time to test it. :) Can I add your Tested-by?

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security