lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <14322466.yTyg3YtxMl@aspire.rjw.lan>
Date:   Sat, 22 Jul 2017 00:40:46 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:     Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Mason <slash.tmp@...e.fr>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: OF: Use pr_debug() instead of pr_err() while adding OPP table

On Wednesday, July 12, 2017 11:10:14 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 07/12, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > Some platforms add the OPPs dynamically from platform specific drivers
> > instead of getting them statically from DT. The cpufreq-dt driver
> > already ignores the return value of dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table() to
> > not error out for such cases, but we still end up printing error message
> > from that routine. That's not nice.
> > 
> > Convert the print message to use pr_debug() instead.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Mason <slash.tmp@...e.fr>
> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> > ---
> 
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>

Applied, thanks!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ