[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170721234327.GA24530@x1>
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2017 07:43:27 +0800
From: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
keescook@...omium.org, matt@...eblueprint.co.uk,
tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com, izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com,
fanc.fnst@...fujitsu.com, thgarnie@...gle.com,
n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 RESEND] x86/boot/KASLR: Restrict kernel to be
randomized in mirror regions
On 07/21/17 at 07:37pm, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > > > +static inline bool process_efi_entries(unsigned long minimum,
> > > > + unsigned long image_size)
> > >
> > > ugly linebreak again ...
> >
> > The whole line is more than 80. I break the line and use tab and space
> > to make it align with above 'unsigned long minimum'. Don't know why it
> > becomes messy in patch. Will check and try again.
>
> Then make the linebreak less ugly, or ignore the checkpatch warning!
>
> This commonly used pattern:
>
> static inline bool
> process_efi_entries(unsigned long minimum, unsigned long image_size)
>
> looks a lot better than the function parameter list broken in the middle.
Got it, will use this one. Thanks a lot!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists