[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1500688839-30247-3-git-send-email-suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 21:00:39 -0500
From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, bp@...e.de,
peterz@...radead.org, Yazen.Ghannam@....com,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/amd: Fixup cpu_core_id for family17h downcore configuration
For family17h, current cpu_core_id is directly taken from the value
CPUID_Fn8000001E_EBX[7:0] (CoreId), which is the physical ID of the
core within a die. However, on system with downcore configuration
(where not all physical cores within a die are available), this could
result in the case where cpu_core_id > (cores_per_node - 1).
Fix up the cpu_core_id by breaking down the bitfields of CoreId,
and calculate relative ID using available topology information.
Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
index 74d8d7c..d2fbfdf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
@@ -301,36 +301,71 @@ static int nearby_node(int apicid)
*/
static void __get_topoext(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
{
+ u16 l3_nshared = 0;
u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
+ if (cpuid_edx(0x80000006)) {
+ cpuid_count(0x8000001d, 3, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
+ l3_nshared = ((eax >> 14) & 0xfff) + 1;
+ }
+
cpuid(0x8000001e, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
smp_num_siblings = ((ebx >> 8) & 0xff) + 1;
- if (c->x86 == 0x15)
- c->cu_id = ebx & 0xff;
-
- if (c->x86 >= 0x17) {
- c->cpu_core_id = ebx & 0xff;
-
- if (smp_num_siblings > 1)
- c->x86_max_cores /= smp_num_siblings;
- }
+ switch (c->x86) {
+ case 0x17: {
+ u32 tmp, ccx_offset, cpu_offset;
- /*
- * We may have multiple LLCs if L3 caches exist, so check if we
- * have an L3 cache by looking at the L3 cache CPUID leaf.
- */
- if (cpuid_edx(0x80000006)) {
- if (c->x86 == 0x17) {
+ /*
+ * In family 17h, the CPUID_Fn8000001E_EBX[7:0] (CoreId)
+ * is non-contiguous in downcore and non-SMT cases.
+ * Fixup the cpu_core_id to be contiguous for cores within
+ * the die.
+ */
+ tmp = ebx & 0xff;
+ if (smp_num_siblings == 1) {
/*
- * LLC is at the core complex level.
- * Core complex id is ApicId[3].
+ * CoreId bit-encoding for SMT-disabled
+ * [7:4] : die
+ * [3] : ccx
+ * [2:0] : core
*/
- per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu) = c->apicid >> 3;
+ ccx_offset = ((tmp >> 3) & 1) * l3_nshared;
+ cpu_offset = tmp & 7;
} else {
- /* LLC is at the node level. */
+ /*
+ * CoreId bit-encoding for SMT-enabled
+ * [7:3] : die
+ * [2] : ccx
+ * [1:0] : core
+ */
+ ccx_offset = ((tmp >> 2) & 1) * l3_nshared /
+ smp_num_siblings;
+ cpu_offset = tmp & 3;
+ c->x86_max_cores /= smp_num_siblings;
+
+ }
+ c->cpu_core_id = ccx_offset + cpu_offset;
+
+ /*
+ * Family17h L3 cache (LLC) is at Core Complex (CCX).
+ * There could be multiple CCXs in a node.
+ * CCX ID is ApicId[3].
+ */
+ per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu) = c->apicid >> 3;
+
+ pr_debug("Fixup coreid:%#x to cpu_core_id:%#x\n",
+ tmp, c->cpu_core_id);
+ break;
+ }
+ case 0x15:
+ c->cu_id = ebx & 0xff;
+ /* Follow through */
+ default:
+ /* LLC is default to L3, which generally per-node */
+ if (l3_nshared > 0) {
u8 node_id = ecx & 0xff;
per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu) = node_id;
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists