[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5972CA1E.60500@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2017 11:44:30 +0800
From: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
Ganapatrao Kulkarni <ganapatrao.kulkarni@...ium.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Allow GIC ITS number more than
MAX_NUMNODES
On 2017/7/21 19:20, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 21/07/17 11:06, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> On 2017/7/21 17:51, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>> From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
>>>
>>> When running 4.13-rc1 on top of D05, I got the boot log:
>>>
>>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 0 -> ITS 0 -> Node 0
>>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 0 -> ITS 1 -> Node 0
>>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 0 -> ITS 2 -> Node 0
>>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 1 -> ITS 3 -> Node 1
>>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: ITS affinity exceeding max count[4]
>>>
>>> This is wrong on D05 as we have 8 ITSes with 4 NUMA nodes.
> I'm not seeing this on the D05 I have access to. Actually, I'm not
> seeing any data related to SRAT and the ITS. Is that a different firmware?
Yes, actually it's just a updated version in this week, that's why
the bug wasn't be spotted when Ganapat's patch was merged.
>
>>> So dynamically alloc the memory needed instead of using
>>> its_srat_maps[MAX_NUMNODES], which count the number of
>>> ITS entry(ies) in SRAT and alloc its_srat_maps as needed,
>>> then build the mapping of numa node to ITS ID.
>>>
>>> After doing this, I got what I wanted:
>>>
>>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 0 -> ITS 0 -> Node 0
>>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 0 -> ITS 1 -> Node 0
>>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 0 -> ITS 2 -> Node 0
>>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 1 -> ITS 3 -> Node 1
>>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 2 -> ITS 4 -> Node 2
>>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 2 -> ITS 5 -> Node 2
>>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 2 -> ITS 6 -> Node 2
>>> [ 0.000000] SRAT: PXM 3 -> ITS 7 -> Node 3
>>>
>>> Fixes: dbd2b8267233 ("irqchip/gic-v3-its: Add ACPI NUMA node mapping")
>>> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
>>> Cc: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <ganapatrao.kulkarni@...ium.com>
>>> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
>>> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
>>> index 3ccdf76..fb1c090 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
>>> @@ -1847,7 +1847,7 @@ struct its_srat_map {
>>> u32 its_id;
>>> };
>>>
>>> -static struct its_srat_map its_srat_maps[MAX_NUMNODES] __initdata;
>>> +static struct its_srat_map *its_srat_maps __initdata;
>>> static int its_in_srat __initdata;
>>>
>>> static int __init acpi_get_its_numa_node(u32 its_id)
>>> @@ -1861,6 +1861,12 @@ static int __init acpi_get_its_numa_node(u32 its_id)
>>> return NUMA_NO_NODE;
>>> }
>> Oops, need to check if the its_srat_maps valid or not here, please
>> comment on what else I'm missing or wrong, then I will prepare another
>> version.
> Please post a patch that has all of the fixes, and I'll review that.
Will do that later.
Thanks
Hanjun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists