[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170722063602.GB2050@nazgul.tnic>
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2017 08:36:02 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cocci@...teme.lip6.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH] EDAC: remove unnecessary static in
edac_fake_inject_write()
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 10:08:12PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> Someone pointed out that the rule is probably not OK when the address of
> the static variable is taken, because then it is likely being used as
> permanent storage.
Makes sense to me.
> An improved rule is:
Do you think it is worth having it in scripts/coccinelle/ ?
I don't think Gustavo would mind putting it there :)
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists