lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 22 Jul 2017 10:33:02 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] tile: array underflow in setup_maxnodemem()

My static checker correctly complains that we should have a lower bound
on "node" to prevent an array underflow.

Fixes: 867e359b97c9 ("arch/tile: core support for Tilera 32-bit chips.")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>

diff --git a/arch/tile/kernel/setup.c b/arch/tile/kernel/setup.c
index 443a70bccc1c..b1474e7d9afb 100644
--- a/arch/tile/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/tile/kernel/setup.c
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ static int __init setup_maxnodemem(char *str)
 {
 	char *endp;
 	unsigned long long maxnodemem;
-	long node;
+	unsigned long node;
 
 	node = str ? simple_strtoul(str, &endp, 0) : INT_MAX;
 	if (node >= MAX_NUMNODES || *endp != ':')

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ