lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170723125414.GG2729@localhost>
Date:   Sun, 23 Jul 2017 14:54:14 +0200
From:   Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:     Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
        Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel23498@...il.com>,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: greybus: Match alignment with open parenthesis.

On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 03:10:53PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 10:47:43AM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 02:09:57PM +0530, Shreeya Patel wrote:
> > > Alignment should match with open parenthesis.
> > > This fixes the coding style issue.
> > 
> > No, it need not. This is a choice left up to the author, even if
> > checkpatch happens to complain about it with the --strict option.
> > 
> 
> This is staging code.  Don't try to fight checkpatch.pl in staging...
> You're just making work for everyone else (me) who already just reviewed
> this patch and I don't want to review it a few more times when the next
> person sends the exact same patch.

You can just ignore any greybus patches if you prefer.

I've considered patching checkpatch to drop --strict for at least this
subsystem, but not sure it's worth it.

Johan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ