linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] perf report: Make --branch-history work without callgraphs(-g) option in perf record

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170724234403.GA5316@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 Jul 2017 16:44:03 -0700
From:   Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:     "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>, jolsa@...nel.org,
        peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kan.liang@...el.com, yao.jin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf report: Make --branch-history work without
 callgraphs(-g) option in perf record

On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 02:41:07PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 11:49:30AM +0800, Jin, Yao escreveu:
> > Hi Arnaldo,
> > 
> > Is this patch OK for merging? It's more than 2 months no more comments.
> 
> This is not an area I'm completely familiar with, so having other people
> vouch for it, reviewing, acking it surely should speed merging, can you
> find someone willing to provide that? If not I'll try and do it.

The patch looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>

-Andi